Trending
High Court division bench sets aside single bench order on CPM book stall in Bongaon
Reported by Kavya Rao (Senior Writer) · ABP Ananda ·
Confirmed by a second source: Anandabazar Patrika
The Calcutta High Court division bench led by Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam set aside a single bench order that had allowed a CPM book stall in Bongaon. During the hearing, Chief Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge asked if CPM had taken permission for the stall, and the CPM lawyer replied that state permission was not taken, though the SDO was informed and around one hundred stalls set up there every year without permission. The court noted that a law cannot be ignored just because it has not been enforced for forty years, and made it clear that rules apply to everyone equally.
Further Directions
Beyond the CPM stall, the court directed police to check if Hindu Jagran Manch had permission to set up their book stalls, ordering necessary steps to remove stalls that lack proper permits. The legal battle began after police denied permission for CPM book stalls during Durga Puja in Bongaon and Naihati. Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya of the single bench had earlier permitted the Bongaon stall on Thursday, stating that the law is equal for all. The state government challenged this decision in the division bench, leading to the Friday ruling. The next hearing for the case is scheduled for January 21, while reports emerged on Friday of CPM stalls being vandalized across the state, including an incident in Entally, Kolkata where Kamardanga Sadar Durgotsab Samiti objected to stall construction.
Context
Courts frequently examine whether public bodies and political groups follow mandatory permit processes for temporary events and stalls on public land. Such legal disputes often balance long-standing local traditions against strict enforcement of municipal and police regulations. Judicial reviews aim to ensure that rules regarding public space and permissions are applied without political bias.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
The Calcutta High Court division bench stepped in to review and set aside an earlier single bench order that had permitted a political party to set up a book stall without official state permission.
Why It Matters
This case highlights the legal boundary between administrative rules and political activities in public spaces. It establishes that customary practices of bypassing permit processes cannot override statutory regulations, and that enforcement authorities must apply rules uniformly across different groups.
What Happens Next
The case will proceed to the next hearing on January 21, where police compliance regarding permit checks for all concerned stalls will likely be reviewed.
More from today
PoliticsVerified — Confirmed by a second source: CBS News - PoliticsMajor
Donald Trump Endorses Benjamin Netanyahu Late in Israeli Election Race
Reported by Shreya Kapoor (Senior Writer) · ABC News - Politics ·
