General
Madras High Court criticises HR&CE department over delay in punishing former temple officer
Reported by Rituparna Sen (Section Editor) · The Hindu - National ·
Reported by one source so far
The Madras High Court has pulled up the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments department for failing to take quick action in 2011 against a former Executive Officer accused of letting tenants build permanent structures on temple lands.
Details of Misconduct
The court stated that the case against former Executive Officer R. Jayakumar of the Thiyagaraja Swamy Temple in Tiruvarur showed poor oversight. In 2011, he allowed tenants to take over valuable temple properties and failed to cancel land ownership documents given to private individuals. He was also accused of giving ₹40 lakh of temple money to a civil contractor without proper approval.
Court Rulings
Devotees and the Adheenam complained about these actions, which eventually led to the officer's dismissal from service in 2015. However, a single judge of the High Court had ordered that the punishment be reduced to a five-year denial of promotion and directed the department to take the petitioner back into service in 2024. The Second Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and Krishnaswamy Govindarajan set aside that order, stating that reducing the punishment under writ jurisdiction is legally incorrect and that dismissal was the right penalty for the proved misconduct.
Context
The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments department is responsible for managing public temples and their properties in the state. Courts often examine how government bodies oversee temple assets to prevent illegal land grabs and protect religious properties.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
A division bench of the Madras High Court set aside a single judge's order that had reduced the dismissal of a former temple executive officer to a minor promotion penalty.
Why It Matters
This ruling clarifies the legal limits of judicial review in government disciplinary cases. It reinforces that courts should not interfere with strict administrative punishments like dismissal when serious financial and property misconduct involving public trusts is proven.
What Happens Next
The department's original dismissal order stands, meaning the former officer remains out of service, and the ruling sets a precedent for how courts treat disciplinary actions in temple administration cases.
More in General
GeneralUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farWorth knowing
New association formed to bring film editors together across India
Reported by Varun Krishnan (Senior Writer) · The Hindu - National ·

GeneralUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farWorth knowing
OCTOPUS Police Chief Urges Students to Build Courage and Discipline.
Reported by Varun Krishnan (Senior Writer) · The Hindu - National ·
