Politics
DOJ Seeks to Halt Alaska Senate Certification Over Voter‑Confusion Claim
Reported by Danish Ansari (Fact-Checker) · CBS News - Politics ·
Confirmed by a second source: Google News - USA Politics (search)
The Justice Department has filed a lawsuit asking a federal court to stop the certification of Alaska’s Senate race if incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan does not win in November. DOJ argues that votes cast for another GOP candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan, were meant to mislead voters and could have swung the result in favor of Democratic challenger former Rep. Mary Peltola. Four candidates – Dan Sullivan, Daniel J. Sullivan, Mary Peltola and Republican Gerald Heikes – have qualified for the general election, which uses ranked‑choice voting.
What Happened
DOJ’s filing on Friday warned that voters could accidentally select the wrong Sullivan and might fail to rank the incumbent, risking a loss. The Alaska Supreme Court in June upheld a lower‑court order letting Daniel J. Sullivan remain on the ballot, overturning a state Division of Elections decision that deemed him ineligible for causing voter confusion.
Reaction
Daniel J. Sullivan’s lawyers said Alaska law does not give officials the power to exclude a qualified candidate based on potential confusion. A DOJ spokesperson said the suit aims to protect the integrity of Alaska’s election and the will of its voters.
Context
Alaska moved to ranked‑choice voting in 2022 after changing its election system in 2020 to curb polarization. The state previously saw an unusual outcome in 2010 when Sen. Lisa Murkowski won a write‑in campaign after losing the GOP primary.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
The Justice Department sued to block certification of the Alaska Senate race if incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan loses, claiming that the presence of another candidate named Daniel J. Sullivan was intended to confuse voters and shift votes toward Democratic challenger Mary Peltola.
Why It Matters
If the court sides with DOJ, Alaska’s election results could be nullified or delayed, setting a precedent for how name‑similar candidates are handled nationwide. The case also raises questions about the limits of federal intervention in state election rules and the effectiveness of ranked‑choice voting in preventing vote splitting.
What Happens Next
A federal judge will review the DOJ’s request; a ruling either blocking certification or allowing it to proceed will come before the November election outcome is finalized. Both parties have indicated they will appeal any unfavorable decision, so further legal battles are possible.
More from today
Politics• UpdatedExplainerUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farImportant
Iran Demands Compensation From US As Officials Discuss Ongoing War Pressures.
Reported by Aakash Bora (Staff Writer) · CBS News - Politics ·
