The Daily Pulse

Business

CBI Files Second Charge Sheet Against Reliance ADA Group Executives and Firms in Fraud Case

Reported by Tanvi Pillai (Section Editor) · The Hindu - Business ·

Unconfirmed — Reported by one source so far

Reported by one source so far

Important
CBI Files Second Charge Sheet Against Reliance ADA Group Executives and Firms in Fraud CaseRepresentative image · Wikimedia Commons

Second Charge Sheet Filed

The Central Bureau of Investigation has filed its second charge sheet in the Reliance Home Finance Limited case against 11 accused parties, bringing the total number of people and entities charged in the matter to 15. The latest legal action names three prominent executives from the Anil Ambani-led Reliance ADA Group: Amit Bapna, who serves as the Director and Chief Financial Officer of Reliance Home Finance Ltd; Amitabh Jhunjhunwala, the Group Managing Director and Vice Chairman of Reliance Capital Ltd; and Suresh Nagarajan, the Chief Financial Officer of Reliance Power Limited.

Accused Companies and Individuals

Aside from the three senior officials, the charge sheet also targets seven corporate entities linked to the group. These companies are Reliance Infrastructure, Reliance Power, Reliance Big Entertainment, Reliance Broadcast Network, Reliance Business Broadcast News Holdings, Reliance MediaWorks Financial Services, and Kunjbihari Developers. Additionally, a private individual named Vijay Napawaliya, who works as a chartered accountant and the statutory auditor for Reliance Home Finance, has been included as an accused.

Allegations and Fund Diversion

The investigating agency stated that the accused face charges of criminal conspiracy and cheating under the Indian Penal Code. According to the agency, the probe shows that funds totalling 7,429.16 crore rupees borrowed by Reliance Home Finance were diverted through various intermediary and conduit entities to other group companies. This diversion allegedly violated loan terms set by lenders, causing wrongful losses to public sector banks and financial institutions while benefiting the accused entities.

Investigation Background

The case was originally opened by the Central Bureau of Investigation following complaints from a consortium of public sector banks, led by Union Bank of India. The first charge sheet in this specific case was filed on July 9, 2026, against four accused persons. Overall, the agency's Bank Securities and Fraud Branch has registered nine separate First Information Reports involving various Reliance group companies based on complaints from public sector banks, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation. Seven charge sheets have now been filed in total across these group cases, with seven people arrested so far, while the Supreme Court monitors the ongoing investigation.

Context

Large corporate fraud investigations involving public sector banks often take extended periods to move through the courts due to complex financial trails and numerous intermediary shell companies. When corporate loans are diverted away from their stated business purpose, lending banks face severe financial stress that can impact the broader banking system. Investigators typically rely on forensic audits of bank accounts to trace how borrowed capital moved through various conduit firms before reaching final corporate beneficiaries.

ExplainerWhy this matters

What Happened

The Central Bureau of Investigation filed a second charge sheet naming eleven new accused parties—including three top executives, seven group companies, and an auditor—in a corporate fund diversion probe involving Reliance Home Finance Limited.

Why It Matters

This case highlights systemic vulnerabilities in corporate lending by public sector banks in India. When hundreds of crores meant for specific business operations are allegedly siphoned off through complex networks of intermediary firms, it weakens the financial health of public lenders and strains the nation's banking sector, ultimately threatening public funds.

What Happens Next

The special court in Mumbai will review the new charge sheet and evidence submitted by the investigating agency. Meanwhile, the Central Bureau of Investigation stated that its wider probe into other group companies and the roles of additional individuals remains active under Supreme Court monitoring.

Read more at The Hindu - Business →