General
Supreme Court to hear plea on Delhi voter form dispute after Deepavali
Reported by Kunal Bhatia (Senior Writer) · The Hindu - National ·
Advocate Prashant Bhushan told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that the Election Commission of India is still forcing voters removed from Delhi electoral rolls to use Form 6, which is meant only for brand-new voters.
Court Hearing
On October 28, the Supreme Court stated that the poll body was in error by making deleted voters apply again as new applicants under Form 6 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. Petitioners and activists Anjali Bhardwaj and Amrita Johri, along with advocates Cheryl D'souza and Neha Rathi, argued that this forces old voters to falsely claim they are new applicants, which is an offence carrying a prison sentence. The Chief Justice of India noted on Wednesday that the case will be heard after the Deepavali holidays on November 19, and told voters they need not fear while the top court is handling the matter.
Deadlines and Next Steps
The Chief Justice observed that the Election Commission has moved the deadline for claims and objections from October 30 to November 25. Mr. Bhushan stated that voters are caught in a dilemma because making a false declaration in Form 6 invites criminal prosecution. The Bench instructed the petitioners to file a formal application on this issue and added that the poll body could be asked to push the deadline back even further if needed.
Context
Form 6 is standardly used across India by citizens registering to vote for the first time or moving to a new constituency. Electoral roll revisions are routine administrative exercises conducted to update voter lists by adding eligible citizens and removing entries for individuals who have shifted or passed away.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
Following a Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Delhi, many pre-existing voters found their names deleted and were told by the Election Commission to re-apply using Form 6. Petitioners challenged this in the Supreme Court, arguing that Form 6 is restricted to new voters and requires a declaration that can penalise existing citizens for false representation.
Why It Matters
Electoral rolls form the bedrock of democratic elections, and any administrative flaw that disenfranchises legitimate voters or forces them into legal jeopardy threatens the right to vote. The dispute centers on whether administrative roll-revision errors should strip citizens of their long-standing voting rights or force them through improper bureaucratic procedures.
What Happens Next
The Supreme Court has asked the petitioners to file a formal application and scheduled the next hearing for November 19. The court indicated it may direct the poll panel to extend deadlines further if necessary while the legal questions surrounding voter re-enrolment are resolved.
More in General
GeneralVerified — Confirmed by a second source: Indian Express - IndiaImportant
Karnataka Government Increases Bus Fares Across State Corporations
Reported by Ananya Das (Senior Writer) · The Hindu - National ·
GeneralVerified — Confirmed by a second source: Hindustan Times - IndiaImportant
Cyclone Murasu weakens into depression as heavy rains batter Andhra Pradesh.
Reported by Sneha Patil (Staff Writer) · The Hindu - National ·

