General
Thousands of West Bengal Voters Miss Bye‑election as Tribunal Appeals Stall
Reported by Shreya Kapoor (Senior Writer) · The Hindu - National ·
Reported by one source so far
Nearly 19,000 voters in West Bengal’s Nandigram and Rejinagar constituencies will be unable to vote in Tuesday’s bye‑elections because their appeals are still pending in sluggish Appellate Tribunals. The two seats are part of a larger pool of 38.31 lakh voters in the state whose enrolment cases remain unresolved, a backlog the Calcutta High Court warned could take 21 years to clear at the current pace. In Rejinagar, 12,452 appeals were filed and only four have been included so far; in Nandigram, 6,443 appeals were lodged and 89 have been included. No appeals have been excluded, yet the tribunals have cleared just 1.26 lakh of the 38.31 lakh pending appeals – roughly three percent of the total. The Election Commission set up 19 Appellate Tribunals in March, but three retired judges – Justice T.S. Sivagnanam, Justice Ranjit Bag and Justice Indrajit Chatterjee – quit, leaving their benches vacant and reducing functional tribunals to 16. The Commission’s plan to raise the number of tribunals to 42 has stalled, and a Supreme Court hearing scheduled for October 5 was not listed. A special door‑to‑door drive to re‑enrol voters missed those still waiting in the tribunals. The tribunals were created after the Supreme Court ordered a separate appellate body for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Judicial officers restored about 32.77 lakh voters and rejected 27.23 lakh, of which 22 lakh appealed. Over 16.1 lakh bulk appeals challenged the inclusion of restored voters, pushing the total pending cases just above 38 lakh.
Context
The backlog reflects systemic delays in processing electoral roll disputes, a problem that can affect election outcomes when large numbers of voters remain excluded.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
The Election Commission set up 19 appellate bodies to hear appeals on voter enrolment under the Special Intensive Revision. Three judges quit, leaving only 16 tribunals active, and the courts have cleared just a tiny fraction of the 38 lakh pending cases.
Why It Matters
When large numbers of eligible voters cannot cast a ballot, election results may not reflect the true will of the people. The delay also undermines confidence in the electoral process and highlights gaps in the legal framework for timely voter registration.
What Happens Next
The Commission’s proposal to double the number of tribunals to 42 is still pending, and the Supreme Court has not yet taken up the issue. Continued pressure from civil society and political parties may force the courts to schedule a hearing, but without additional judges the backlog is likely to persist.
More in General
GeneralVerified — Confirmed by a second source: NDTV - Top StoriesImportant
Moderate earthquake hits Uttarakhand with tremors reaching New Delhi
Reported by Siddharth Deshmukh (Staff Writer) · The Hindu - National ·
