The Daily Pulse

Business

Yes Bank Shares Fall After Supreme Court Upholds AT-1 Bond Ruling

Reported by Siddharth Deshmukh (Staff Writer) · Livemint - Markets ·

Verified — Confirmed by a second source: Indian Express - Business

Confirmed by a second source: Indian Express - Business

Major
Yes Bank Shares Fall After Supreme Court Upholds AT-1 Bond RulingPhoto: Wikimedia Commons

Capital Impact

Yes Bank stated that its Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio could drop by around 250 basis points after the Supreme Court dismissed appeals and upheld a judgment against the write-down of Additional Tier-1 bonds worth ₹8,415 crore. The disputed write-down took place in March 2020 as part of the bank's financial rescue and reconstruction.

Market Reaction

Despite the expected drop in core capital, the bank's overall Tier 1 ratio is projected to stay at 14% on a pro forma basis. However, investor worry over the ruling triggered a 14% stock crash in Thursday's trade, followed by another 3.42% fall on Friday, pushing the stock down 19% for the year 2026.

Next Steps

Yes Bank announced it is studying the judgment in detail and looking at its legal choices while maintaining that it has access to capital-management tools to support its growth. Meanwhile, S&P Global Ratings stated it does not expect the ruling to change its bank ratings, noting that the lender's capital remains safely above minimum regulatory requirements.

Context

Additional Tier-1 bonds are special perpetual instruments that banks issue to build up their capital base, offering higher interest rates because they carry more risk than regular bonds. Courts review such major financial write-downs to ensure that all procedural rules and rescue schemes are followed correctly by regulators and lending institutions.

ExplainerWhy this matters

What Happened

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Yes Bank, the Reserve Bank of India, and the Union government, thereby upholding a past Bombay High Court decision that set aside the 2020 write-down of AT-1 bonds worth ₹8,415 crore. The High Court had earlier ruled that procedural rules were not followed correctly when the bonds were cancelled during the bank's government-backed rescue.

Why It Matters

This ruling affects how banks and regulators handle financial rescues and whether perpetual bonds can be written down easily during a crisis. For investors, it clarifies the legal protections surrounding riskier bank debt instruments, though it also creates short-term financial uncertainty and stock volatility for the lender involved.

What Happens Next

Yes Bank is currently reviewing the court order to determine its legal options and potential actions. Ratings agencies like S&P expect the bank to remain adequately capitalized in the near term, but markets will closely watch how the lender manages its capital levels and any further legal proceedings.

Read more at Livemint - Markets →