General
Supreme Court to Hear Centre Plea Against Jharkhand DGP Appointments
Reported by Deepak Mishra (Copy Editor) · The Hindu - National ·
Reported by one source so far
Photo: Openverse - wikimediaThe Supreme Court will hear a plea by the Union government accusing the State of Jharkhand of appointing Directors General of Police in defiance of top court orders issued over the past two decades. Chief Justice of India Surya Kant agreed to urgently hear the matter on Wednesday, following a request from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to also list a related contempt petition for hearing. A Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana will hear the petitions.
Core Issues
The Union government, acting through the Home Ministry, has asked the court to declare the Jharkhand Regulation of 2025 for selecting and appointing its police chief as ultra vires. The Centre argues this state regulation violates the landmark 2006 Prakash Singh versus Union of India Supreme Court judgment, which set rules for transparent DGP appointments from senior empanelled officers and mandated a two-year minimum tenure to prevent political influence. The application specifically challenges the appointments of Anurag Gupta and Tadasha Mishra as Jharkhand DGPs under these 2025 regulations, calling the appointments legally infirm and contrary to specific court directions. The Centre wants the court to declare these appointments illegal and force Jharkhand to follow the Prakash Singh guidelines.
Context
Disputes over police chief appointments often arise between state governments and the Centre regarding adherence to judicial guidelines designed to keep police leadership independent of political control. The Prakash Singh judgment remains a key legal benchmark used to challenge state-level rules that bypass national transparency and tenure norms for top police posts.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
The Union government has moved the Supreme Court against the State of Jharkhand, challenging its 2025 state regulations for appointing the Director General of Police and questioning the appointments of Anurag Gupta and Tadasha Mishra under those rules.
Why It Matters
This case centers on the division of power and accountability in police administration across India. The 2006 Prakash Singh judgment was meant to shield police chiefs from political interference by mandating fixed tenures and transparent selection from senior pools. When states create independent rules, it sparks a legal battle over whether state authority or judicial guidelines take precedence in maintaining the rule of law.
What Happens Next
The Supreme Court bench will hear the petitions, including the Centre's plea and the connected contempt petition, to decide if Jharkhand's 2025 regulations and the resulting DGP appointments violate previous judicial directives.
More in General
GeneralUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farWorth knowing
AIADMK Leader Palaniswami Confident Party Will Return To Power
Reported by Aakash Bora (Staff Writer) · The Hindu - National ·
