Business
New Mexico Court Slaps Meta with $25 B Penalty Over Data‑Privacy Violations
Reported by Varun Krishnan (Senior Writer) · CNBC - Top News ·
Reported by one source so far
A New Mexico court ordered Meta to pay a $25 billion penalty for violating the state’s unfair practices act. The penalty stems from a data‑privacy case that traces back to the company’s 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal. A Santa Fe jury in September found the social‑media giant liable for misleading residents about how it collects and protects user data and for allowing harmful content to spread. The jury counted more than 43 million separate violations, each carrying a possible civil fine of up to $5,000. While the jury’s award totalled $219.5 billion, the presiding judge reduced the amount to $25 billion in a filing on Wednesday. New Mexico’s lawsuit was filed in 2021 by former state Attorney General Hector Balderas and was overseen by current Attorney General Raúl Torrez. Meta had previously settled a nationwide set of Cambridge Analytica‑related privacy suits in August for nearly $17 billion, but New Mexico was not part of that deal, so its case went to trial. In 2022 the company also agreed to pay $725 million to end a class‑action suit linked to the same scandal. Earlier this year a separate New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for child‑safety violations, and a judge later added $567 million to an abatement fund. Meta has said it disagrees with the latest ruling and plans to appeal.
Context
State enforcement actions like this one show how U.S. jurisdictions are using unfair‑practice laws to hold tech firms accountable for data‑handling practices. The penalty adds to a series of settlements that have cost Meta billions since the Cambridge Analytica revelations.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
A New Mexico judge reduced a jury‑awarded $219.5 billion fine to $25 billion, ordering Meta to pay that amount for more than 43 million violations of the state’s unfair practices act linked to the Cambridge Analytica data‑privacy scandal.
Why It Matters
The penalty demonstrates that state courts can levy massive fines on tech companies even after larger national settlements, signalling that companies may face additional costs if they are not part of broader agreements. It also reinforces the power of state unfair‑practice statutes to address misleading data‑privacy claims and to protect residents from harmful content.
What Happens Next
Meta has said it will appeal the decision, so the fine may be delayed while higher courts review the case. Observers will watch for whether the appeal succeeds and whether other states pursue similar actions, which could shape future data‑privacy enforcement across the country.
More in Business
BusinessUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farImportant
Ukrainian drone attacks cripple Russian diesel exports and push fuel prices higher.
Reported by Siddharth Deshmukh (Staff Writer) · CNBC - Top News ·
BusinessUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farImportant
PC Jeweller reports surge in Q2 net profit and clears all bank debt.
Reported by Varun Krishnan (Senior Writer) · Livemint - Markets ·

BusinessUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farImportant
Edelweiss-Backed EAAA India Alternatives Sets ₹1,200 Crore IPO Price Band.
Reported by Danish Ansari (Fact-Checker) · Livemint - Markets ·
