Science & Environment
Villagers from Assam and Meghalaya unite against joint 55MW dam on Kulsi River
Reported by Abhishek Tiwari (Copy Editor) · The Hindu - Energy and Environment ·
Reported by one source so far
More than 2,000 villagers from Assam and Meghalaya rallied at Ukiam on Oct 8, 2026 to reject a joint 55‑megawatt hydropower‑irrigation dam on the Kulsi River. The dam, announced in June 2025 by the two state governments, would be built at the confluence of the Dron, Shree and Dilma rivers, about 80 km southwest of Guwahati, and would stand 62 metres high. It would flood the natural habitat of the endangered Gangetic dolphin and affect 46 villages in Kamrup district of Assam and West Khasi Hills district of Meghalaya. The Assam‑Meghalaya Joint Protection Committee (AMJPC), formed in 2025, organised the protest and highlighted that traditional chiefs must give a no‑objection certificate for any project on Meghalaya land. Three chiefs – Kestor Manik Syiem Iich of Nongkhlaw, Phlowing Syiem Nongbak of Nongmynsaw and Order Syiem Sad of Rambrai – said they would not grant consent. AMJPC president Albert Nonglang warned that monetary compensation could not cover long‑term social and ecological damage. The Ministry of Jal Shakti says the dam would irrigate about 26,000 hectares, help control floods and generate 55 MW of power, while the Brahmaputra Board estimates a cost of ₹1,454.95 crore (June 2017 price). ## Context The dispute reflects a broader clash between development plans and the rights of indigenous communities, especially where projects threaten fragile ecosystems and require traditional consent under Indian law.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
The Assam and Meghalaya governments announced a 55 MW hydropower‑irrigation project on the Kulsi River in June 2025. Villagers and traditional chiefs gathered on Oct 8, 2026 to oppose it, citing loss of habitat for the Gangetic dolphin and displacement of 46 villages.
Why It Matters
The dam would alter a key tributary of the Brahmaputra, threatening an endangered dolphin species and the livelihoods of indigenous Bodo, Garo, Khasi and Rabha people. Under Indian law, projects on Meghalaya land need a no‑objection certificate from local chiefs, making their refusal a legal hurdle. The promised benefits – irrigation of 26,000 ha, flood control and 55 MW of power – must be weighed against long‑term ecological damage and social disruption.
What Happens Next
State officials are likely to revisit the project’s consent process, possibly seeking legal clarification or redesigning the scheme to address tribal concerns. Ongoing protests may lead to a pause in construction while negotiations continue, and the issue could be taken to the courts if consensus is not reached.
More from today
Science & EnvironmentUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farWorth knowing
Visakhapatnam Fined 10 Industries Over Pollution as Air Quality Crosses National Limits.
Reported by Deepak Mishra (Copy Editor) · The Hindu - Energy and Environment ·
EducationUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farWorth knowing
Six Years After NEP 2020, India Struggles to Move Beyond Exam Marks
Reported by Neha Sharma (Staff Writer) · Bing News - Education (India) ·
