General
Nobel winner calls fears of foreign control over modified crops 'nonsense'
Reported by Ishita Mukherjee (Staff Writer) · The Hindu - National ·
Reported by one source so far
Nobel laureate Sir Richard John Roberts has dismissed concerns that adopting genetically modified crops would make India dependent on foreign companies, stating that Indian laboratories can develop and own such technology locally. Dr. Roberts delivered this address on Tuesday in New Delhi at the second Emerging Science, Technology and Innovation Conclave held at Bharat Mandapam.
Local Research
Rejecting the term genetically modified as misleading, Dr. Roberts referred to the technology as biotechnologically modified and argued that evolution has altered every life form. Addressing fears that American corporations could control seed supply, he called the idea nonsense and explained that anyone can learn to use gene-editing tools like CRISPR in a matter of weeks without relying on Western nations.
Policy And History
India currently permits commercial cultivation of Bt cotton, which Dr. Roberts termed a success, but does not allow any GM food crops. The country's history with GM food includes a 2010 moratorium on Bt brinjal by then-Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh and a 2024 Supreme Court split verdict on GM mustard that asked the Centre to frame a national policy. Critics such as Kavitha Kuruganti from the Coalition for a GM-Free India have argued that yield claims lack backing from developer data and that India needs a biosafety policy instead.
Food Security
Dr. Roberts framed the issue around food and nutritional security, noting that food serves as medicine for people who cannot afford supplements. He stated that Golden Rice is not priced above ordinary rice and that several Indian government institutes hold licences for it, adding that Bt brinjal raised yields in Bangladesh.
Context
Genetically modified crops involve altering an organism's DNA using modern biotechnology to introduce desired traits like pest resistance or higher nutritional value. The debate in India highlights a long-running tension between boosting agricultural productivity and addressing safety, environmental, and regulatory concerns.
ExplainerWhy this matters
What Happened
Nobel laureate Sir Richard John Roberts stated that India does not need to rely on foreign companies for genetically modified crops because the research and ownership can happen entirely within Indian laboratories using gene-editing tools like CRISPR.
Why It Matters
Genetically modified crops are a major point of debate in India, balancing the urgent need for food security and higher farm yields against safety concerns, intellectual property disputes, and the historical caution shown by regulators regarding GM food crops like brinjal and mustard.
What Happens Next
India's Supreme Court has directed the Centre to frame a national policy on GM crops, and future developments will depend on how policymakers weigh scientific advancements against environmental and regulatory safeguards.
More in General

GeneralUnconfirmed — Reported by one source so farWorth knowing
Teachers Union Demands Old Pension Scheme and Stronger Public Education in Vijayawada.
Reported by Deepak Mishra (Copy Editor) · The Hindu - National ·
