Bhuvneshwar Kumar's T20 comeback draws criticism and support

Bhuvneshwar Kumar's return to India's T20 side has been marred by an expensive spell in the fourth match, prompting former players to question the selection. In the fourth T20I, India swapped Kumar for youngster Mayank Yadav, who claimed three wickets in the game. Kumar earned his recall after a strong showing for the Royal Challengers Bengaluru in the IPL, but the pitches and opposition batters proved unforgiving; he managed only three wickets across the series and gave away more than ten runs per over. Former batsman Aakash Chopra raised the issue on his YouTube channel, noting that while Prasidh Krishna missed the ODI squad due to injury, Kumar was not chosen for the one‑day side despite a leaky three‑match run. Chopra added that the management's decision seemed to signal they have “had enough” of Kumar’s comeback, leaving fans disappointed. Ajinkya Rahane, also speaking on YouTube ahead of the fourth T20I, urged fans not to over‑judge the bowler, reminding that experience brings ups and downs and that Kumar will reflect on his shortfall. Rahane highlighted the positive angle, calling Kumar’s return at his age a “biggest story” and urging appreciation for his perseverance, suggesting he could still turn things around with a five‑wicket haul. The debate underscores the fine line between giving a seasoned bowler another chance and the pressure of immediate results.

Context

Veteran bowlers often face intense scrutiny when returning after a poor spell, especially in T20 cricket where selection hinges on recent form. India's management routinely balances experience against current performance, leading to swift changes when results dip.