The Daily Pulse

Trending

Supreme Court rejects attempts to pressure judiciary over political protests

Reported by Imran Qureshi (Staff Writer) · Eenadu ·

Verified — Confirmed by a second source: AP7AM

Confirmed by a second source: AP7AM

Important
Supreme Court rejects attempts to pressure judiciary over political protestsPhoto: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court of India on Thursday ruled that political protests aimed at pressuring the courts are unacceptable and will not be entertained. The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, issued notices to opposition leaders including Rahul Gandhi, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, Tejashwi Yadav, Supriya Sula, and Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Routh, among others, for filing petitions challenging election‑related processes. Notices were also sent to the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, Election Commissioners Sukbeer Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, and the central government for the same set of petitions. The court clarified that issuing a notice does not mean it accepts the arguments in the petitions; the next hearing will examine the behavior of a petitioner whose conduct it described as “serious”. Senior advocate Bhatia was asked to appear before the bench to discuss the matter, and the judges warned that no one can intimidate the judiciary. Separate notices were issued regarding a petition to suspend the special comprehensive revision of voter lists (S.O.R.) and another petition filed by Asaduddin Owaisi’s party seeking a stay on the Jantar Mantar protest‑site list. The court noted that the central government had de‑notified Jantar Mantar after a previous October 9 order, and it ordered preservation of video records of any incidents inside court premises. The judges also responded to concerns that small businesses suffer during festival‑time protests, stating that such grievances will be examined in the pending cases.

Context

These developments come as the judiciary seeks to maintain its independence amid a wave of political rallies and court‑premise protests across Delhi. The court’s stance signals a stricter enforcement of rules that keep the legal system free from external pressure.

ExplainerWhy this matters

What Happened

The Supreme Court of India rejected several petitions filed by opposition politicians and others that sought to challenge election‑related actions and the status of protest sites, issuing notices to the petitioners and to the Election Commission.

Why It Matters

The court’s decision underscores the principle that the judiciary must remain free from political pressure. By refusing to allow protests inside court premises and by treating notices as procedural, not substantive, the bench aims to protect the rule of law and prevent the legal system from being used as a battleground for partisan disputes.

What Happens Next

The next hearing will focus on the conduct of a specific petitioner whose behavior the judges described as serious. Depending on that inquiry, the court will decide whether to admit the petitions for full hearing. Meanwhile, the government’s de‑notification of Jantar Mantar and the preservation of protest footage will be reviewed as part of the ongoing legal scrutiny.

Read more at Eenadu →