The Daily Pulse

Technology

US-China AI Tensions Rise Over Copying Claims

Reported by Arjun Sethi (Fact-Checker) · Indian Express - Technology ·

Unconfirmed — Reported by one source so far

Reported by one source so far

Worth knowing
US-China AI Tensions Rise Over Copying ClaimsRepresentative image · Pexels

Anthropic, OpenAI and Google have accused Chinese companies of unfairly copying their artificial intelligence technologies over the past two years. These claims became a central point of discussion as Chinese leader Xi Jinping visited President Donald Trump in Washington this week. American firms like Anthropic and OpenAI lead the artificial intelligence race, but Chinese startups like Z.ai and Moonshot are growing fast. Silicon Valley argues that Chinese companies are copying U.S. technologies using a technique called distillation. Many experts note that claims from Anthropic and OpenAI are overblown. Charles O'Neill, a head of model training at Baseten, stated that the narrative that Chinese tech capabilities come entirely from an Anthropic model is not as true as people say. First developed in the early 2010s, distillation helps researchers build efficient technologies to run on cheaper hardware. Geoffrey Hinton, a former Google researcher who helped create the technique, recently explained that one model acts as a teacher and another as a student. Recently, firms have used this technique to collect data from competitor systems by setting up multiple accounts on services like Claude or OpenAI's GPT to generate data for training new systems. Legal experts say distillation might violate the Defend Trade Secrets Act, but U.S. courts have not yet ruled on this. Copyright law does not clearly apply because distillation copies general behavior rather than exact text. Critics point out that American firms have faced similar issues. Anthropic settled a major lawsuit last year by agreeing to pay a large amount to a group of authors and publishers after a judge found the company illegally used copyrighted books to train its systems. In June, Anthropic sent a letter to U.S. lawmakers accusing Chinese tech giant Alibaba of distilling its technologies. Chinese firms have not responded publicly to these accusations. Distillation does not give companies access to underlying computer code, only output data like words and characters. Rehaan Ahmad, co-founder of alphaXiv, noted that firms using outputs must still build a powerful base system first, which requires extra work, money and computing power. Companies try to curb distillation by shutting down suspect accounts, but doing so risks blocking real users. Lino Le Van, another researcher at alphaXiv, stated that stopping distillation is basically impossible.

ExplainerWhy this matters

What Happened

American artificial intelligence companies have accused Chinese tech firms of using a data-sharing process called distillation to copy advanced models. This technical issue has now turned into a major geopolitical dispute discussed by national leaders.

Why It Matters

Distillation sits in a gray area of the law, creating uncertainty around intellectual property rights in the fast-growing artificial intelligence sector. While American firms argue it amounts to theft of trade secrets, experts debate how effective the practice truly is and whether existing copyright laws apply to behavior-based copying rather than direct text theft.

What Happens Next

Tech companies will likely continue trying to block suspected accounts, though experts warn that completely stopping distillation is nearly impossible without hurting regular users. Meanwhile, U.S. courts and lawmakers will face growing pressure to clarify legal rules around artificial intelligence training methods.

Read more at Indian Express - Technology →